Issue Date: 5/8/06
Senate Republicans nix gas rebate plan
By James Kuhnhenn
KRT NEWS SERVICE
KRT NEWS SERVICE
- Page 1 of 2 next >
WASHINGTON - Seeking to end days of public ridicule, Republicans in Congress backed away May 2 from a proposal to offer taxpayers $100 rebates to offset high gasoline prices. They tried instead to convince voters that there's no immediate remedy for the pain at the pump.
It was the second oil-related setback in as many days for Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who was forced to drop a proposal he made the previous week to change the way business treats inventories for tax purposes, which would have cost corporations billions in higher taxes. That was to be a prime source of revenues to pay for the $100 rebates.
Democrats gleefully rubbed their hands over the Republicans' quandary and blamed an oil-friendly administration for today's high-energy prices. Democrats called for more fuel-efficient vehicles and a broader investigation into price-gouging than what President Bush has already proposed. Republicans pressed for greater refining capacity and more oil production.
High gasoline prices this spring are especially troubling for Republicans, who face difficult re-election prospects in November.
The partisan scrambling illustrated both the difficulty of identifying realistic solutions and a bipartisan desire to make a populist appeal to the public.
Frist linked the $100 rebate to an energy-relief package that included the accounting changes and a call for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a proposal the Senate frequently rejects.
But even as Frist and Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., defended the rebate proposal May 2, other Republicans were declaring it dead.
"It is off the table. It is gone," said Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho.
House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, called Frist's rebate proposal "insulting."
"Over the weekend I heard about it from my constituents a few times," Boehner added. "They thought it was stupid."
The $100 was supposed to represent the amount of federal gasoline taxes that motorists pay in one year. Santorum said the rebate would temporarily help consumers faced with higher prices.
It was the second oil-related setback in as many days for Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who was forced to drop a proposal he made the previous week to change the way business treats inventories for tax purposes, which would have cost corporations billions in higher taxes. That was to be a prime source of revenues to pay for the $100 rebates.
Democrats gleefully rubbed their hands over the Republicans' quandary and blamed an oil-friendly administration for today's high-energy prices. Democrats called for more fuel-efficient vehicles and a broader investigation into price-gouging than what President Bush has already proposed. Republicans pressed for greater refining capacity and more oil production.
High gasoline prices this spring are especially troubling for Republicans, who face difficult re-election prospects in November.
The partisan scrambling illustrated both the difficulty of identifying realistic solutions and a bipartisan desire to make a populist appeal to the public.
Frist linked the $100 rebate to an energy-relief package that included the accounting changes and a call for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a proposal the Senate frequently rejects.
But even as Frist and Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., defended the rebate proposal May 2, other Republicans were declaring it dead.
"It is off the table. It is gone," said Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho.
House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, called Frist's rebate proposal "insulting."
"Over the weekend I heard about it from my constituents a few times," Boehner added. "They thought it was stupid."
The $100 was supposed to represent the amount of federal gasoline taxes that motorists pay in one year. Santorum said the rebate would temporarily help consumers faced with higher prices.
Be the first to comment on this story